


Anurag
Kashyap has given very realistic Bihar in Gangs of Wasseypur and Delhi and
Punjab in DevD. Tigmashu Dhulia is true to the local cultural connotations in
Haasil and Paan Singh Tomar. He displayed his grasp over the atmospherics in
the Sahib Bibi and Gangster series too. Dibakar Bannerjee talked of very
authentic Delhi in Khosla Ka Ghosla and Lucky oye Lucky. Jolly LLB by Subhash Kapoor
is possible only by someone who has seen lower judiciary from very close
quarters
All
these directors have local background in North India and have resorted to their
memory bank. For example Tigmanshu Dhulia clearly revisited his Allahabad University
days when he was portraying student politics in a tier two town. Dibakar
Bannerjee in an interaction at Goa Film festival explained how sounds and whispers
of Delhi creep in his stories. These directors are good at using the characters
they have seen for the context of their screenplay. For example, Shanghai is
not a Delhi Movie but DU educated Dibakar has enough IAS friends to base the
character of Abhay Deol. Srivatsa Krishna the IAS topper of his batch even sang
Vishnu Sahastranaam in the movie.
Their
success lies in getting the tone right while still avoiding the documentary
trap. Paan Singh Tomar is as realistic as Dholpur Murena can get. Language,
local bravado of petty people, rules of hierarchy among relatives and local
musclemen and above all ways of dealing with fear in general and authority in
particular give the flavour of local culture. The journalist in Paan Singh
Tomar is quintessential struggling stringer with all his insecurities and
ambitions. These directors find characters and spend time on them. Once
established, reactions and mannerisms of these characters take the story forward.
Wassypur has many memorable characters both main and peripheral whose prototype
(not necessarily the brutal violent streak) have been experienced by the
director or his team. They are able to cull out the interesting aspects of these
characters, cultural specificities and particularities of local flavour and deploy
them for creating a gripping experience on celluloid. Here beauty is created by
unflinching attitude towards the mundane and often ugly side of reality. Here ‘art
of sweet excesses’ is not smelling sweet still it is entertaining. However this
is not the only way of deploying reality. Creating beautiful frames can also
serves the purpose provided beauty is not used to create distance from the
rawness of the experience.
Rakeysh
Omprakash Mehra does that when he creates mesmerizing Delhi in beautiful frames
of Rang De Basanti and a different set of Delhiwallas in Delhi-6. Heightening
the beauty in a particular context may be even needed to convey the peculiarities
of that context. A creative person is carrying out a valid aesthetic task when he
framing beauty by harnessing the technical possibilities of his medium. Rows of
tube lights lining Dhabas in outer Delhi in Rang De
Basanti may be play of cinematography but fully convey the gaiety that informs
such a place. It is not much a question of beautiful of murky portrayal. If you
choose to convey the beautiful subject it will be good looking without becoming
plastic. Similarly violent, loud and dirty depictions need not look good.
Either will work if primacy of story is kept intact. DevD’s Paharganj may look
more enticing than Times Square but it never forgets its task of conveying the
intended mood- cravings and confusions of an alcoholic.
In
the end, I am not saying that there never was genuine representation of North
Indian milieu in Hindi Movies. However, I think with growing number of
directors from the region the portrayal is finding its dramatic possibilities
in a more natural way.
No comments:
Post a Comment